Jock Foot Fantasy

[Brody]

Be wary if you choose to join this site. They advertise themselves as a site of barefeet and tickling, but they have recently decided to have entire updates with no barefeet or tickling---just shoes. The weekly updates are usually well filmed and hot, but if you expect the updates to be true to the advertising, you may be disappointed. They are not responsive to emails about this issue.

[fructis]

shoes videos?

kind of a waste if u ask me - as an xtra I dont mind it but as a whole video and update? HELL NAW.

Just saying.

[luc]

yes, sadly, jff has gotten pretty repetitive with models. not very imaginative lately. and yes. there is no need of an update without bare feet. each update, imho is best to start with shoes, go to sock and always needs to satisfy with the feet. there are shoe fetish sites for those into that sort of thing, right? thanks for starting this thread! luc

[alanalt]

Actually, one of the things I found most appealing about JFF is that they neither tie themselves to one particular type of model (or at least their range of 'jocks' is a petty wide one) nor to one particular aspect of the foot fetish (i.e. they have tickling, barefeet, socks, shoes, domination, 'gentler scenes' etc.). It seems to me that too many sites focus specifically on only one particular aspect (like tickling or barefeet) or one particular kind of model (like twinks). I also like how the site has improved since it was first launched.

But while I applaud the site's aim to be diverse in exploring the fetish, when the updates are so infrequent, it does have the negative effect noted by the previous posters. Also when I was a subscriber, I was often p*ssed off by the fact that an update often only included 'part' of a scene and that you had to wait weeks for further updates to see how the whole scene played out. I also wished that you could have the option of downloading the 'entire' scene rather than having it broken into a bunch of smaller separate clips.

In short, while there are a lot of things I like about JFF, there just are too many 'irritants' and not enough 'value for money' that keep me from being a regular subscriber to the site. :rolleyes:

[ftlaudft]

There's no doubt that JFF has a great variety of beautiful hunks, some of the hottest on the Net. But the downloading in segments is a bit of a drag.

You have to compare, inevitably, with other sites such as ToeGasms. ToeGasms allows you to download the whole segment in one simple operation. It's true, many of the models are very youngish, but many of the "twinks"' have very adult sex packaging. Cain and Boomer and Rad and Puppy look very young. But their dicks look like the map of Florida and they squirt enough juice to turn the Gobi Desert into an oasis. And there are enough of the regular big-boy jocks like Kelly Cooper and Mike Roberts to keep my motor oiled and running. Throw in a stud like Cherokee and you can take your solo digital sex to new heights. He's so sexy you'll find yourself indulging in vegetable sex. (That's where the cucumbers vanish from the salad bowl. Try it, but don't let on we told you.)

Yes, I do miss Seth and Lars and others from JFF. What did we ever do before the Internet?

[alanalt]

Sorry, I disagree with the last post, because I find Toegasms to have even less 'value for money' than JFF. For one thing, while it looks like Toegasms has lots of updates, the reality is that a lot of their updates are picture sets only and most of their video updates are solos. That ends up leaving you with one (maybe two, if you're lucky) video update(s) a month that has more than one model in them. :(

I also tend to see the Toegasms model pool as one vast (white) sea of twinks, with only an occasional skater-boy in for 'variation', if you can call it that. Also, while most of the videos offer you the choice between downloading a single clip or several smaller clips, it's not quite the case with all of them (or at least it wasn't when I was a member earlier this summer). And finally, you'd think that a site that offered so many pictures, would give their members the option of downloading a gallery as a single .zip file, but if that feature was there, I sure didn't see it (but then I'm not all that wild about pictures anyway - when videos, IMO, are so much better and, quite honestly, I can find tonnes of barefoot guy pics on the Internet for free).

In short, to this foot lover, JFF has lots of flaws - but Toegasms has more... :rolleyes:

[ftlaudft]

Well, one thing I think we will all agree on is that every site has its plusses and its minusses, its strong points and its weak points. What a person finds a strong or weak point will depend on what he comes to the site looking for, what he brings with him in terms of expectations and preferences. Some look for twinks and some look for bears. Some tickle and some worship. Some like 'em hot and some like 'em cold.

How lucky we are to live in a country where we can have a polite disagreement over foot fetish sites! I was recently reading an article in which an Iranian actress was describing the death by stoning of two gay teenagers in Iran. They were buried up to their waists in the ground and then the crowd threw stones at them. It took them over an hour and a half to die. In this country we have a black president addressing the largest gay rights group in the nation, supporting our right to exist at all. What a difference!

I enjoy reading the reports of the different members here, some who like one site, some who prefer another. In the long run, if it's a pay site, we can vote with our wallets. But what impresses me most of all is the vastness of the sites on the Internet. It's not just one lone foot fetish site that I can explore. There are dozens of them! And I used to think I was the only footlover in the world! How wrong I was!

Jock Foot Fantasy, ToeGasms, MyFriendsFeet, BigToeFanciers, LittleToeWorshipers - there's room for all you guys here! The complaint booths are always open! And so is the compliment department!

[Brody]

My complaint with JFF is that ENTIRE updates are sometimes given over to models wearing shoes with no barefeet. That would be fine for a site that advertised itself as a site featuring footwear, but it claims to be a site about bare feet and tickling. It would be much more acceptable to this subscriber to include at least one or two clips of barefeet among the typically 6 clips per update. Also annoying is the lack of response from the owner of the site about this.

[ftlaudft]

When you tell a site owner what you don't like about a site, you're doing him a favor. How can a site improve if the owners don't know what brings customers in and what keeps them away? If enough complaints come in about model types or particular scenes (such as the shoe thing), you'd think the site owners would realize they're losing business if they don't modify their direction. We vote with our pocketbooks. If I ran a pancake palace and served only blueberry pancakes - and nobody bought them - what do you think I should throw out? The blueberries or the pancakes? It's good to let the sites know what we do like about them, too.

[noahwestin]

Does anyone know the background of Jock Foot Fantasy? I have followed JFF since its opening in the fall 2006 and have noticed its changes.

Originally, it featured much more tickling, the models were exclusive and changed much more often, there was at least a small attempt at a set up or story line, the same guy did the tickling and worshiping, the action seemed to take place in a spare bedroom, and bare feet were always included. Even when the action was nominally about worship or teasing, some tickling would be included. There were signature details like the unusual feather used to tickle the guys, and the way that the tickler ripped off the guys' socks. I got the feeling that the tickler/worshiper was the site owner and that he ran the site because he himself actually enjoyed jock feet and tickling. The site was fresh. The tickling scene with Adrian, a baseball player, was probably the best example of the original content, and one of my favorites.

Changes in direction seem to coincide with the changes in graphics in early 2008. At first, the overall graphics were on a blue background. The logo used to include an animated feather tickling an animated pair of jock feet. Around February 2008, the logo was reworked and the backgrounds became today's red and yellow.

Now, tickling is much less featured in favor of worshiping and other aspects never shown originally, such as sniffing, rubbing, domination, foot play, shoes and run-of-the-mill oral sex. Teasing, which never interested me anyway, seems thankfully gone. Many of the guys, such as Zach, Graham, Lars and Ryan, can be seen elsewhere—not necessarily a bad thing, but I did appreciate having exclusive models. Action seems to take place in a staged studio. The tickler, worshiper, top, or bottom, seems to change. Unlike the original tickler, the present ticklers do not seem to know what they're doing. An example and low point for me was Aidan, who spent far too much time mugging to the camera and goofing off when he tickled Dawson, and likewise when Aidan himself was the ticklee. (Dawson was my near-ideal ticklee—easy-going, strong, nice feet, good laugh, genuinely ticklish—and with Aidan's goofing off, Aidan seemed to waste the opportunity with Dawson.) I absolutely do not get domination, smells, shoes or socks (although I acknowledge that other people do and that's fine with me). So I did not even bother watching last week's post with Evan in shoes dominating some poor guy, or Josh doing the same thing a few weeks ago, or Seth's trashed chucks some months before that—I found all a complete waste of time and money. (How can a site claiming to be about feet not show feet? Claiming that shoes are worn on feet seems a stretch to me.) I also agree that posting four more segments of a scene started weeks earlier does not qualify as new content, and is therefore not giving the audience its money's worth. The original poster to this thread said that the site owners are unresponsive to E-mails about this issue. Being unresponsive is also not giving a paying customer his due. In short, these days, the site's whole performance, from jock to worshiper/tickler, to the photography, to postings seems phoned in by a new owner who's running the site for money only.

I recognize that everyone's preferences are not my own, and that the owners have their own reasons for running such a site. Even so, I'll say that I enjoyed JFF much more in its original form than in its present. This year's direction especially has changed so much that I almost don't recognize the site and I'm considering dumping it.

Back to my original question: Anybody, what's behind the changes? Although I'll take speculation, I'd love to get some concrete, behind-the-scenes knowledge, such as the site's ownership changed, or audience feedback prompted the new direction.

Thanks for any info anyone might have.

[fructis]

Oh there is one thing I DISLIKE WITH PASSION.

An update with tickling feet. The hell with this? I mean just like shoes, give the tickling videos as a bonus because with them touching the feet and the model twisting in every angle u cant see "crap" about the feet and to me tickling is not sexual if anything funny to watch for 30 sec and perhaps more fun if you do it in real life but being that its a video.... I dont care about it. (reason why I do not subscribe to MasterLewis - they tickle more than anything. snoozefest if u askme)

I like toegasms but sometime I feel like the models are just TOO young looking or perhaps they should eat a burger or two ( im young but thats too young for me) and also the girly side of them. Most of the model are waxed to the teeth and have their brows done. All is missing is some hair extension and lipstick.

But them videos of Kelly being worshiped are just BRILLIANT. I just wish to have Evan do the same. :P

Anyways thats my big no no - girly looking guys - shoes - tickling.

[Brody]

I actually like the tickling and the domination. I just object to updates with no barefeet.

[fructis]

Could you explain to me what is it that you enjoy about watching a video of someone being tickled?

[Brody]

I think you are either into tickling or you're not, just like having a foot fetish. JFF advertises itself as a site that includes tickling, so there should be no surprise or issue when tickling is included. JFF includes a lot of tickling, so if that bothers you, you should probably not subscribe.

[fructis]

I was talking in general.

Of course if the website says they may have tickling video I WILL EXPECT THEM just not watch them.

Iv been a member before and was pleased with most of the content. Just skipped the tickling videos.

But it doesnt change the fact that I dont see the point of it. I mean when you think about it. U cant see much. U only hear the other dude laughing or screaming.

And most of the time they will even tickle the armpit , getting the camera out of the feet. (pointless)

I dont remember the name of that particular website but they had this VERY HOT looking dude with nice looking feet and the ONLY video the webmaster did of him was a tickling video. The model never came back. (a shame )

[BootsMcGraw]

Howdy.

Y'all are straying from the original topic, which was discussing the Jock Foot Fantasy site. Please move the conversation back there, unless you would like me to split these threads into two physically separate topics within this same board. It's your call.

[Actually... I would like to try that, being one of the moderator abilities I haven't yet explored.]

[dert2011]

Many of the guys, such as Zach, Graham, Lars and Ryan, can be seen elsewhere—not necessarily a bad thing, but I did appreciate having exclusive models.

CAN ANYONE share any info re LARS from JFF.... Where else can I find this guy and does he have a "KNOWN" name or last name or just any further info would be appreciated in advance.........TY

[alanalt]

CAN ANYONE share any info re LARS from JFF.... Where else can I find this guy and does he have a "KNOWN" name or last name or just any further info would be appreciated in advance.........TY

"Lars" has made a fair amount of gay, bi & str8 porn under a variety of names - including Danny, Memphis Blake and Kevin Falk. A partial videography can be found here: http://www.smutjunkies.com/profiles/f/a_stars/Falk_Kevin/index.html

Hope this helps.

[Footlover4Ever_J]

Not to stray away from the topic at hand.

But I'm in agreement to some/all the post regarding JFF, I thought I was the only one.

The thing that really bugs me is the weekly updates where you see something you might like, then it's in chunks, some tickling, some feet, some play, some risque scenes. They seem to mature in some areas in terms of variety, but having to wait and hope week after week after week (Wednesdays/Thursdays) and come to find out, it's something you may not care for. Tickling is a come and go for me (don't care for it much -- I like the feet/visulalize thing), and the models are good to a point, but when it gets to become a high-low thing, it becomes impossible to enjoy your money's worth. I had to cancel some times and come back, only to cancel (it all adds up if you're not a yearly member) unless if they come up with some good segments I like.

But yeah, I just wish they would follow the same mode as do TG in terms of full videos instead of clips, but that's their site...

...as for us to what we want/like, well, can't win 'em all.

Whoops, x-post from alanalt on the "Lars" infor -- Thanks!

[dert2011]

"Lars" has made a fair amount of gay, bi & str8 porn under a variety of names - including Danny, Memphis Blake and Kevin Falk. A partial videography can be found here: http://www.smutjunkies.com/profiles/f/a_stars/Falk_Kevin/index.html

Hope this helps.
I am so appreciative of UR help in finding LARS.... WOW....
Thank you---U didn't have 2 B helpful 2 me and YET..... nice....

[darand79]

I liked Jock Foot Fantasy... the little bit I've seen of it... but after using the site for like 10 minutes, I seem to get locked out. This has happened twice. They were responsive the first time in unlocking my account, but the next day, I was locked out again. I received no information about why I was locked out and have received no response in two days (while my time ticks away). Anyone else have this issue?

[somecanuck]

If you download too much within a certain amount of time, the site automatically locks your account

[luc]

I agree that it is pretty sad to have an update in which the shoes never come off. But I do find that JFF is one of the best sites for the money recently. The vid quality is always great, and you can count on updates every week. When you see one of those teaser sets without the feet, at least you know that a follow up set will eventually satisfy, and often there is more than just the one update given in a week.

Lately, I'm finding that a lot of our old favorite sites are morphing ...and not for the better.

Agreed, Toegasms has really gone way downhill! Seems like fewer updates. Too many really twinky types just being repeated in different sets. Not very imaginative either. They used to have lots of sexy duos and even foot orgies with amazing worship. Without this, I just save money by skipping the subscriptions.

Also, what happened to My Friends Feet? Now it is almost ALL tickling, and very rare worship scenes. For the first time in many years, I have not subscribed for many months. I used to have a full annual subscription. But again, Good to save the cash.

I'd like to see a thread started with all of us chiming in about what are the best sites and updates, etc. If nobody does it, I will try to set aside some time to get it started. We should all be keeping each other informed about all of this stuff.

Thanks to you guys for getting this started.

[footjeans]

Used to enjoy JFF........my favorite guys on there were Nick & Joey. Sexy guys with good shots of their hot feet!

[ftlaudft]

The FootBuddies site right here has an option titled "'Site Reviews"' in the top band, between Forum and FootBuddies Store. Maybe it could be used to advantage for what Luc has suggested about keeping up with the different sites of interest.

[Footlover4Ever_J]

I re-joined JFF to check up on updates and see what I like, every Thursday it seems to lag or takes way into Friday for the updates to kick in. It does get frustrating at times when all they have is just tickling and some foot worship, and it's not complete. You may have a foot worship session for one day, and they seem to follow up a couple of weeks. I mean, they have some variety, but the waiting period can be a pain.

I, too wish there are some interesting sites that have some good foot worshiping clips (pay or otherwise). I'll check back here from time to time.

[footguycgy]

Hey guys anyone else having problems bringing up Jock Foot Fantasy website? Everytime i try i reach a screen saying in bold letters FORBIDDEN, you dont have permission to access / on this server. I tried accessing the site since yesterday to check out their latest Thurs update and no luck??? Any thoughts?

[mike22222]

I haven't run into that, but I have noticed that the updates are taking longer and longer to appear. I'm not a member anymore but I still check just in case something piques my interest.

[Footlover4Ever_J]

I haven't run into that, but I have noticed that the updates are taking longer and longer to appear. I'm not a member anymore but I still check just in case something piques my interest.

I've done the same thing too. It seems I'm not alone with the updates.