Lucas's "'Hard & Wet": how to piss off your boyfriend...

[ftlaudft]

Actually, this latest film from Lucas Entertainment illustrates how to piss ON your boyfriend. So why did I buy it? I'll tell you why. It stars that gorgeous French Canadian hunk Gabriel Lenfant, that's why! And I figured, when guys piss on each other, they take off their shoes and their socks, so there ought to be good sightings of bare feet.

The title says it all and Michael Lucas delivers what he promises: golden showers not seen since the Great Flood. These guys have really robust and healthy kidneys that would rival the Fountains of Rome. We could have used them to put out the wildfires recently.

Yes, this is another of those kissame-pissame pictures and we shouldn't complain. Piss people need love too, ya know! But for foot lovers? That's where there will be some disappointment.

The opening shots show Gabriel's cock. It's the perfect length. It's solid. It's round. It's firm. It looks delicious. It has a beautifully shaped head. So munchable! So slurpable! So everything a dude's penis ought to be! But where's the feet? Very hard to see. Yes, he's barefoot. But the shots of his feet are accidental or coincidental and never designed to seduce the footsie folk.

It's as though Michael is saying, with that nasty Russian gangster snarl of his, ""Look, perv! If you want foot action, buy "'Foot Action!"" We give you piss. We give you ass. And we give you dick. That's what I promised. That's what I deliver. READ THE LABEL!"'

OK, Michael! I get it. I would also recommend, for those interested in the supremely beautiful Gabriel Lenfant, the film "" Uncut Canada"' in which a delightfully barefoot Gabriel frolics with a friend in Montreal. Another goodie is "'Backdoor"" in which Gabriel shows off another of his talents. He shaves the asshole of Jonathan Agassi. Now, that's what I call trust! Agassi's asshole is a very important tool of his trade, and if he lets someone get that close with a razor, it's got to be love, trust and blind devotion. This same Agassi, by the way, stars in a bonus chapter of ""Hard & Wet"" in the only foot action of the disc. He spits on a guy's bare foot and then places the guy's bare feet briefly around his pecker and masturbates thusly. Briefly.

This picture "'Hard & Wet"' has me asking myself some hard & wet questions. For example, if Gabriel came to me and said, ""I will let you suck my gorgeous bare feet, but first you must let me pee in your mouth!"" what would I do?

Well, I'd have to think about that one. I mean, I do have my towering principles. But I''m not inflexible...

[alexandre]

Sorry "FTLAUDFT", but we'll have......" to agree to disagree" concerning the Lucas site, any longer.

As you well know, I use to be a "HUGE" Lucas site fan. BUT.......after he took that Dyke, Mr. Gob Shite, or whatever she's called, along with replacing all of his "HOT" foot loving men, his scenes have become very toe sucking/foot licking less.

He may have some hot hot guys doing scenes, but they need to learn how to pleasure feet during love making, erotic, sex......"PERIOD"!!

Micheal L. has a "HUGE" foot fetish, as we guys here do, SO!!! There's no point, nor reason, why he has suddenly began to ignore foot loving in his movies, and don't say that it's got anything to do with what the public wants, as most guys enjoy having their toes sucked & feet licked during sex.

I have reviewed all of his older movies, before they did "that violent" foot fetish film,("Feet Extreme"), and every movie, up until that one, had a scene or two with foot action. And - they were hot scenes!!!

So, Lucas needs to replace Ms. Gobo with a director that understands how a man operates when he is truned on (how can "ANY" woman understand how we guys think, or operate? They can't! No more than we men can fully understand the woman's body & how it thinks, or operates.

Micheal needs to hire more male directors. That's just my opinion!

[ftlaudft]

Alexandre, I sense a lot of frustration and disappointment in your comments, and I think I know how you feel. I felt frustrated and disappointed when I was looking at the beautiful Gabriel Lenfant, in all his naked glory, and I was hoping to get a good shot of his sole, a closeup of his big toe, something! Well, it didn't happen. Like you, I have to ask myself, if Michael truly has a foot fetish too, and if he's directing this film along with Mr Pam, why am I not basking in the glorious nakedness of this beautiful hunk Gabriel's bare feet?

I understand that the porn business is just that, a business. I understand further that Michael wears at least three somewhat distinct hats. He's a businessman. He's an artist. He's a political activist. And also he's a sexual human being with an interest in feet.

You know, Alexandre, he's not the only porn maker who understands that feet have an erotic possibility. Chi Chi LaRue has some stunning scenes highlighting foot sensuality. And Kristen Bjorn, especially in his early years, always got comments of "'occasional glimpses of foot fetishism."' Yet in film after film after film, in porn flics of Michael and Chii Chii and Kristen, there will be scenes in which the basic rule of good camera work seems to be "'cut it off at the ankles whenever possible."'

There seems to be a law in the universe that all things must change. Either we go forward or we go backward. Nothing stands still. And so it's not surprising to look at the bodies of work of Michael and Chi Chi and Kristen and see that all of them have evolved, all of them have changed, all of them have moved in different directions. There may be particular films that appeal to us, and even particular stages that appeal to us. But for business reasons, for business laws of supply and demand, for the sake of changes in popular interest, and for reasons of artistic evolution, all the porn masters have become different from what they once were. The question you and I are asking is this: porn has evoved into an industry that has many facets, makes millions, and is now free to show anythng that stimulates. So if porn makers know feet are stimulating, why the hell don't they show them?

I think the answer may be a simple one. It's not the answer I like. Michael, for example, does have a sexual interest in feet, according to what he himself has said. Hé may be a foot fetishist. But I don't believe he's an INTENSE foot fetishist like you and like me. I'm not just a foot fetishist. I'm a FLAMING foot fetishist. I lead the band, I charge at the head of the noble foot crusade, I'm like Hannibal crossing the Footsie Alps with my elephants. But my army of ragtag soldiers is not the cast of thousands you might see in a Hollywood movie. It's just you and me, Alexandre, doing the best we can to keep the movement and interest going.

Don't get discouraged. It gets better. At least we have FootBuddies!

[FootDevotee]

I enjoy the Lucas Raunch films on Water Sports.

As a foot aficionado I also enjoy the Raunch films with foot work. His "FOOT ACTION" will not disappoint.

[alexandre]

As old Ebenzer once said in the "Christmas Carol'......"business is business"!!! And unfortunately the porn business is "NO" different!!

So.....We will just have to keep searching for those hot scenes, where the guys include feet & toes in their loving making.

Thank goodness that Jake Cruises's site; "Cocksuremen" have scenes where the guys enjoy their feet, from time to time.

There's also these sites....."Cocky Boys", "Tim Tales", "Dirty Tony", Blake Mason, & UK Naked Men, where you will see feet included in the scenes, from time to time.

I wish that "Foot Friends" would do more love making scenes, as they have with their very hot movie; "Foot Lust Confessions". The site, not long along, did another hot scene with two guys making love, while they included their feet.

[alexandre]

That they say we have a "Foot Fetish" because we like & admire another guys feet......."YET".......it's not a fetish, though, if you admire & enjoy a guys hands, facial features, color of his hair ( I love red heads) legs, chest, butt, or his pubs. Yet, if you say that you like his feet, than according to other's, you have a "foot fetish". What a load of rubbish I say to that!!!

It's no different than getting into ass eating (Rimming), taking it up the love tunnel, or enjoying eating a guys cum, or licking his armpits. As they also would be classed as a fetish.

I say, it's all just a natural, sexual, enjoyment which our bodies are meant to do.

So.......why do they make such a "HUGE" mountian over a mole hill if most of us enjoy seeing feet & toes included in our gay/Bi porn movies!?!?

They need to get over it, "NOT US"!!!

[FootDevotee]

fetish |ˈfeti sh |
noun
an inanimate object worshiped for its supposed magical powers or because it is considered to be inhabited by a spirit.
• a course of action to which one has an excessive and irrational commitment : he had a fetish for writing more opinions each year than any other justice.
• a form of sexual desire in which gratification is linked to an abnormal degree to a particular object, item of clothing, part of the body, etc. : Victorian men developed fetishes focusing on feet, shoes, and boots.

[ftlaudft]

The definitions of fetish and fetishism are useful because they can help us understand ouselves. We can start with our sex organs, the penis and the vagina, which are prime elements in the sex act. Sex organs are obviously sexual organs, and we distinguish between them and other body parts that may be stimulating, but are not basic sexual elements. Ear lobes, knee caps, belly buttons and elbows may stimulate us to various degrees. But they aren't part of the basic sex package. Hair and eyes may excite us. Hair color and the color of another's eyes may excite us as well. But they aren't part of the basic penis/vagina sex program

A body part that is not a sexual body part may become a fetish when the sexual arousal it provokes equals or surpasses the sexual arousal of the basic sex organs. Many people enjoy feet to a greater or to a lesser degree. There are surely people who sniff feet, lick feet, suck feet, who enjoy themselves and are aroused. But their arousal does not equal the arousal they feel when stimulated by sex organs. Therefore for them the feet are not a fetish.

When I look at scenes from the films of Michael Lucas, Chi Chi LaRue and Kristen Bjorn, I note there are some scenes in which feet are used as erotic elements. But I really am not sure that Michael or Chi Chi or Kristen are true foot fetishists. They are certainly masters of their craft and they understand sexual stimulation in art. They use everything available and everything includes feet.

We have been wondering why feet are so often deliberately omitted in porn. I suspect masters in the craft realize that cock and ass sell. That's where the emphasis is, on the basic and most fundamental core of sexual activity. Yes, there will be piss scenes. Yes, there will be foot scenss. But we will have to look for them and be grateful for what we get.

For some reason, nature has chosen to evolve our reproductive systems with our basic plumbing fixtures, that is, our elimination and waste factories. Since men don't have vaginas, gay men, clever boys that they are, have discovered that the anus makes a pretty good substitute. I remember seeing the sign in a gay pride parade, ""If God had intended for men to be fucked, he would have given them assholes."' Well, there you have it. And so in most porn it's the cock and ass guys who are always satisfied first.

Much progress has been made in modern scientific studies. People used to feel that fetishes were harmful and perhaps a sickness. Most today feel that fetishes are a normal variation in healthy people and that they may enhance the sex life of a normal person. Fetishes are not harmful so long as they do not prevent a person from leading an otherwise normal life.

Our foot fetish should be an extra blessing in our already rich lives. I'm happy. Are you?